← Back to Articles
Commercial Law17 February 2026

Sold As "A Going Concern" - What You Need To Know.

In the realm of commercial property transactions in South Africa, the concept of sold as "a going concern" remains one of the most poorly understood and often mismanaged elements. While the potential benefit of being charged VAT at a rate of 0% instead of the standard 15% presents a lucrative opportunity for both buyers and sellers, failing to meet the stringent criteria set by the South African Revenue Service (SARS) can lead to dire financial consequences. This article explores the nuances involved in the going concern test and highlights the common pitfalls that can lead to commercial properties failing this critical assessment.

At the heart of the going concern principle is the requirement that the property must be part of an income-generating enterprise at the time of sale. SARS explicitly states that for a transaction to qualify for zero-rating of VAT, the purchaser must purchase an operational business capable of continuing seamlessly after the transfer. A frequent oversight occurs when properties lack active income generation, whether due to expired leases, uncollected rent, or informal arrangements. In such instances, SARS may classify the asset as non-trading, consequently denying the VAT advantage and imposing a full tax burden that could dramatically affect the financial viability of the deal.

Completing the sale requires comprehensive documentation, particularly a well-structured lease agreement. Defective or incomplete leases can jeopardize the going concern status; missing signatures, informal handshake agreements, or an expired lease term complicate the legal substantiation necessary to prove that a marketable business exists. It is crucial for all parties involved to recognize that SARS prioritizes documented continuity rather than mere verbal intentions, underscoring the necessity of a legally binding framework for the lease that supports ongoing operations.

Another critical aspect involves ensuring that both parties correctly navigate asset inclusion and exclusion. The entirety of the enterprise must be conveyed to the buyer, which encompasses not only the physical property but also operational components such as equipment, tenant rights, and service contracts. Omitting essential elements can disrupt the trading continuity required for SARS approval, thus transforming the transaction into a standard taxable supply at the full VAT rate, representing a costly error in financial planning.

Furthermore, the timing and formalities associated with the transaction are paramount. Both buyer and seller must be registered VAT vendors at the time of sale. Misunderstandings regarding VAT registration can lead to transactions falling short of compliance if one party intends to register but does so only post-transaction. Clear communication and explicit documentation noting that the property is sold as a going concern, inclusive of VAT at 0%, is essential to safeguard against potential disputes from SARS.

As South Africa's economic landscape evolves, commercial property buyers find themselves increasingly reactive to factors influencing liquidity, finance costs, and cash flow timing. In such an environment, an incorrect classification of a transaction has the potential to generate unexpected VAT liabilities that can disrupt financing arrangements, delay property transfers, or even collapse deals altogether. This issue transcends conventional accounting concerns and demands meticulous legal structuring and documentation.

Ultimately, collaboration between commercial property experts and conveyancing teams, as exemplified by Thomson Wilks, is essential in ensuring that each sale is meticulously structured and compliant with SARS regulations from the outset. Particularly in a tightening market, providing certainty in legal transactions often becomes the decisive factor that transforms a prospective deal into a successful closing. The ramifications of neglecting these details can undermine not only economic opportunities but also the trust and relationships between buyers and sellers. Understanding and adhering to the going concern principles should remain a priority for all stakeholders engaged in commercial property transactions. ***Kindly note that the contents of this article are intended for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult an attorney.

Related Articles

This article is intended for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice specific to your circumstances, please contact Nick Elliot for a confidential consultation.

Book a Consultation